Court Upholds Florida's Firearm Owners' Privacy Act

by
posted on July 31, 2014
** When you buy products through the links on our site, we may earn a commission that supports NRA's mission to protect, preserve and defend the Second Amendment. **
sinews.jpg (99)

In a 2-1 ruling July 25, the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Atlanta upheld a Florida law that restricts intrusive questioning by physicians about patients' ownership and use of firearms. The action reversed a 2012 injunction issued by a federal judge in Miami, who ruled the NRA-supported Firearm Owners' Privacy Act violated the free-speech rights of physicians to counsel their patients about "health-related matters."

The case, Wollschlaeger v. Governor of Florida, challenged the law and insisted physicians had a right under the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution to routinely question patients on their choices concerning firearms ownership as a health-related matter. In its ruling last week, the Court of Appeals rejected the suit's claims.

"The essence of the Act," the court wrote, "is simple: medical practitioners should not record information or inquire about patients' firearm-ownership status when doing so is not necessary to providing the patient with good medical care." Accordingly, the court found that "[t]he Act merely circumscribes the unnecessary collection of patient information on one of many potential sensitive topics."

The court noted nothing in the Florida law prohibits doctors from expressing their views about firearms or about any other medical or public policy issue. Rather, it is within keeping of long-established "codes of conduct that define the practice of good medicine and affirm the responsibility that physicians bear" and "protects a patient's ability to receive effective medical treatment without compromising the patient's privacy with regard to matters unrelated to healthcare."

The Firearm Owners' Privacy Act was passed in 2011 in response to an American Medical Association policy that encouraged doctors to inquire about the presence of firearms in homes.

"We find that the Act is a valid regulation of professional conduct that has only incidental effect on physicians' speech," wrote Judge Gerald Tjoflat, adding, "The Act simply codifies that good medical care does not require inquiry or record-keeping regarding firearms when unnecessary to a patient's care."

Latest

2025 Holiday Gift Guide: Gifts $45 to $83
2025 Holiday Gift Guide: Gifts $45 to $83

2025 Holiday Gift Guide: Gifts $45 to $83

Whether you’re looking for practical gear or just fun, firearm-related stocking stuffers, we’ve got you covered.

How Fast Can You Run?

Can you get out of trouble when it's time to go?

First Look: Wilson Combat WCP365 2.0

Wilson Combat upgrades an iconic pistol from SIG Sauer.

I Carry: Taurus 66 Combat Revolver in a Galco Holster

In this week's episode of "I Carry," we have a Taurus 66 Combat .357 Magnum revolver in a Galco Summer Comfort holster with a Cold Steel Karve knife.

Tech Wisdom: Get It Straight

My first trip to the range with my new Smith & Wesson Model 640 went from eager anticipation to sheer disappointment. The first five shots downrange at 10 yards went into an acceptable cluster on the right edge of the target.

Bond Arms Celebrates 30th Anniversary

Three decades of quality firearms from Bond Arms.

Interests



Get the best of Shooting Illustrated delivered to your inbox.